Solemnity of The Epiphany of the Lord
Readings: Isaiah 60:1-6; Psalm 71 (72):1-2, 7-8, 10-13; Ephesians 3:2-3, 5-6; Matthew 2:1-12
Picture: By Selena Jiménez on Unsplash
What was your New Year’s Day like? Mine was quiet and rather uneventful. But there are those who spent the day engaging in activities that made the news, though for different reasons. On the one hand, separate groups of volunteers chose to reach out to the less privileged. Some distributed supplies to seniors in Nee Soon. Others offered biryani to migrants in Little India. On the other hand, on that very same day, a white van led the police on a dangerous car-chase around Choa Chu Kang. Resulting in the vehicle briefly flying through the air at one point, before crashing into a flight of stairs. The driver was apprehended while trying to run away, and arrested for multiple alleged offences, including that of drug possession. Volunteers and van-driver. Reaching out versus running away. Two contrasting reactions to the arrival of a new year. What are we to make of this? Don’t our scriptures pose a similar question to us today?
Although there are no dramatic car-chases here, every year on this solemn feast of the Epiphany of the Lord, the gospel presents us with a sharp contrast between two reactions to the birth of Jesus, both of which may have made the news in their own day. On the one hand, we’re told that when Herod hears about the arrival of a new king of the Jews, he is understandably perturbed. Not unlike how a cup of bubble tea or kopi gao would feel, when shaken or stirred. He was troubled, agitated. Just as that van-driver was agitated. And we know that the king’s agitation eventually leads him to order the brutal slaughter of innocent children. A dramatically violent form of running away from God. In contrast, when the wise men, or magi, see the star they’ve been following, they are filled… with delight. According to another, more literal, translation (RSV), they rejoiced exceedingly with great joy. Instead of agitation leading them to run away, they experience a joy that prompts them to keep reaching out. They continue following the star in search of the newborn king. And once they’ve found him, they prostrate themselves before him, offering gifts that point to his true identity: gold for his royalty, frankincense for his divinity, and myrrh for the death by which he will save the whole of creation.
The joy of the magi versus the agitation of Herod. What are we to make of these reactions to the arrival of the new King? It’s tempting, at least for me, to see them as presenting a choice between two types of people. The magi are good, and the king is evil. Be like the first, not the second. Be joyful, not agitated. But is this really possible? In the first reading, we find an image we’ve already encountered in the gospel for Christmas Day, taken from the prologue to John’s gospel. Where we’re told that the Word that becomes flesh at Christmas, arrives as a light that shines in the dark. Similarly, in the first reading, when the brilliant light of God’s glory rises upon Jerusalem, it does so while night still covers the earth and darkness the peoples. And don’t we know what it feels like when we’ve been resting in a dark room for some time, and someone suddenly switches on the lights? Whether we wish to or not, aren’t we likely to feel agitated?
Similarly, in the second reading, Paul (or the one writing in his name) refers to the arrival of Jesus as the revelation of a mystery. And a key aspect of this revelation is the shocking news that, in Christ, pagans, or gentiles, now not only share with Jews the same inheritance and the same promise, they are even parts of the same body. For gentile Christians like us, this comes, of course, as no surprise. We take it for granted. But to those who have long believed themselves to have been set apart by God, isn’t it likely to sound like dangerous heresy? Even something to be ruthlessly eradicated? Which is what Paul himself tried to do, while he was still named Saul. Until that fateful day, when he received grace to get over his agitation, and to joyfully embrace the Crucified and Risen Lord.
Could it be that both Herod and the magi represent opposite directions on the same spiritual path? Herod rejects and violently turns away from the Light. The magi accept and joyfully reach out to it. And could it be that the experience of agitation is really an unavoidable part of this path? After all, didn’t Jesus himself feel agitated in the gospels. For example, wasn’t he deeply moved and troubled at the tomb of Lazarus (Jn 11:33, RSV)? Leading him to then raise his friend from the dead. Could it be that the choice our scriptures present to us isn’t so much whether or not to be agitated, as what to do with our agitation? How to be aware of it, sit quietly with it, and consider where it might be leading us. So that we might better choose how we wish to respond, in order to move toward the Light. In Catholic Social Teaching, this process involves a cycle of three recurring steps. First to see or to experience reality. Next, to judge or reflect upon it. To analyse it in the light of both the sacred and secular sciences. Before deciding how to act or respond. Then, having responded, to reflect again on that new experience. And so on.
See, judge, and act. What would it be like, if this process was used to ponder more deeply the dramatic events of New Year’s Day––the experiences of the volunteers, as much as the van-driver? And what if we were to apply it also to the more mundane experiences of our lives? Sisters and brothers, how might we help one another to keep reaching out to Christ our Light, and not run away from Him this Christmas?